VerityPrep School Support

Bocconi Test Critical Thinking Book

Prepare for Bocconi critical thinking: syllogisms and quantifiers, modus ponens and tollens, the square of opposition and informal fallacies. Explore the book.

  • School Support
  • OD
  • Bocconi
Bocconi Book Critical Thinking cover

About this book

This book prepares students for the critical thinking section of the Bocconi admission test. It begins by explaining the two question types you will meet, data and deduction, and passage and assertion.

It then builds the logic behind them: syllogisms and quantifiers, arguments with premises and conclusions in standard form, and deductive validity including modus ponens, modus tollens and formal fallacies. Categorical statements and the square of opposition follow, along with a section on informal fallacies.

The last section covers evaluating arguments by finding assumptions and deciding what strengthens or weakens them. Together these sections give you both the formal logic needed for deduction questions and the practical judgement needed for argument questions. The chapter ends with a revision section.

Look inside

Preview this book

Browse the full contents and read the opening topic.

Sample · 04-Critical Thinking

Chapter 4 Overview

Bocconi Online Test · CHAPTER 4: Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking contributes 9 of the 50 questions. It tests whether you can draw conclusions strictly from the information given, without adding assumptions of your own. There are two kinds of question. In the first, you are given data or rules and must decide which statement must be true or false. In the second, you read a short passage and then judge whether a following assertion is true, false, or impossible to determine from the passage alone. Note the scoring: questions with only three options (the true / false / cannot-be-determined kind) carry a slightly larger penalty for a wrong answer, so treat "cannot be determined" as a real, and often correct, choice.

4.1 The Two Question Types

4.1 The Two Question Types

The golden rule for the whole section is this: use only what you are told. A statement is "true" only if the given information forces it to be true, and "false" only if the information forces it to be false. If the information is simply silent on the matter, the answer is "cannot be determined" — even if the statement sounds plausible or is true in the real world.

📋 How to handle each type

TypeWhat to do
Data and statements (5 options)Build the full picture the rules force, then test each statement against it
Passage and assertion (3 options)Ask: does the passage force the assertion true, force it false, or leave it open?

⚠️ Common traps

The most frequent error is importing outside knowledge or a hidden assumption. A claim can be reasonable, or even correct in reality, yet still be "cannot be determined" if the passage does not support it. Watch also for statements that reverse a conditional (confusing "if A then B" with "if B then A") and for words like "all," "only," and "never" that overstate what the data allow.

Worked Example — Testing an assertion

Passage: "The report says sales rose after the new logo was introduced. It does not examine any other change made at the same time."

Assertion: "The new logo caused the rise in sales."

Working: Sales rose after the logo, but the passage rules out no other cause, so causation is not established. The answer is "cannot be determined."

📋 Logic techniques on the real Bocconi test

Puzzle typeHow to crack it
Truth-tellers and liarsLook for two statements that directly contradict each other — exactly one of them must be the lie. If only one person lies, everyone else is truthful; build the scenario from their true statements.
Necessary vs sufficient"A is sufficient for B" means A → B; "A is necessary for B" means B → A. Being divisible by 10 is sufficient for being a multiple of 5, but not necessary. Do not confuse a conditional with its reverse.
Family / relation chainsFollow the relations step by step. "Only children of X are…", "X's only children are…" set hard limits — anyone outside that list is excluded.
"At least one" (pigeonhole)Combine a count with a limit. If girls \( \ge 6 \) out of 10 and only 4 people are adults, then at least \( 6-4=2 \) girls are not adults.
Ordering / tournament deductionTurn each clue into an inequality or a fixed position, chain them, and eliminate options that violate any clue.
Seating with "no one in their own place" (derangement)Track who took whose seat; the constraint that nobody sits in their own seat usually forces the remaining assignments.

Worked Example — Liars & necessary/sufficient

Continue reading — 1 chapters, worked examples and practice.

Sign in to buy

Built for OD preparation

Topics follow the OD syllabus with visual explanations and worked solutions close to the lesson content.

Readable in the portal

The book opens in the VerityPrep reader with chapter navigation, search and reading controls.

Share-ready link